Comprehensive analysis of marriage patterns and demographic trends over time
Enter your information below to see personalized statistics based on your demographic profile
Comparison of males and females marriage percentages across different age groups for the years 1992, 2002, and 2012.
Unexpected Trend: While we typically expect marriage rates to increase steadily over time, the data shows that female marriage rates in 2012 for younger age groups (15-19) were actually higher than in 2002, breaking the downward trend. This suggests a possible reversal in the delayed marriage pattern for young women. Additionally, the marriage gender gap widens dramatically in middle age, with over 90% of men aged 40-60 married compared to only 60-70% of women in the same age groups.
Current marriage rates comparing males and females across different age groups in 2022.
Unexpected Trend: Contrary to traditional expectations that marriage rates would continuously increase with age until reaching a plateau, female marriage rates actually peak in the 35-39 age group at 75.3% and then steadily decline afterward. This creates a striking pattern where the gender gap in marriage rates grows substantially with age - by the 65+ category, only 32.5% of women are married compared to 70.5% of men. This substantial difference likely reflects both longer female life expectancy and the greater likelihood of men to remarry after divorce or widowhood.
Percentage distribution of women by age at first live birth, comparing overall, rural, and urban populations.
Unexpected Trend: While conventional wisdom suggests that urban women typically delay childbearing compared to their rural counterparts, the data reveals that urban women in the 25-29 age group actually have higher rates of first births (27.7%) than rural women of the same age (23.0%). Similarly, urban women in the 30-34 group have significantly higher first birth percentages (32.9%) compared to rural women (26.8%). This contradicts the expected pattern and suggests that urban women may be deliberately postponing motherhood until their late 20s and early 30s, then having children at higher rates than rural women in these age brackets.
Distribution of women by age at first live birth across different education levels.
Unexpected Trend: While higher education is generally associated with delayed childbearing, the data shows a surprising pattern in the 20-24 age group. Women with secondary education and above have notably higher rates of first births (19.2%) compared to women with no education (8.9%) and those with education level not known (7.6%). This contradicts the expected trend where more educated women would consistently have lower birth rates at younger ages. Also striking is that for women aged 40-44, those with secondary education have much higher rates of first births (59.9%) than those with no education (42.9%) or primary education (37.6%), suggesting educated women are more likely to have their first child at an advanced maternal age.
Distribution of economically inactive population by age group, gender, and rural/urban areas.
Unexpected Trend: Contrary to typical expectations that rural areas would consistently show higher economic inactivity, urban males in the 20-24 age group show surprisingly high inactivity rates (49.0%) compared to other age groups. Another counterintuitive finding is that urban females in the 20-24 and 25-29 age groups have higher inactivity rates (53.8% and 53.0%) than rural females in the same age brackets (46.2% and 47.0%). This urban-rural inversion for young adults suggests that urban youth may face significant barriers to economic participation, possibly due to extended education, competitive job markets, or lack of appropriate employment opportunities in cities.
Educational attainment correlates significantly with family formation patterns. Women with secondary or tertiary education typically delay marriage and childbearing until their late 20s, while those with limited formal education often begin families during their teenage years. However, the cumulative marriage and fertility rates eventually converge, indicating that education primarily influences timing rather than overall family size or marriage probability.
Young rural residents aged 20-29 demonstrate interesting economic participation patterns. They often experience periods of economic inactivity (potentially due to agricultural seasonality or limited formal employment options). Concurrently, they tend to marry earlier and have children at younger ages than their urban counterparts. However, data reveals a surprising reversal in the late 20s and early 30s age brackets, where urban women demonstrate higher fertility rates than rural women - suggesting complex interactions between economic opportunity, education, and reproductive decisions.
A pronounced gender divergence emerges in marriage statistics beyond age 40. By retirement age (65+), approximately 70% of men remain married compared to just 32% of women. This correlates with elevated economic inactivity rates among older women, creating a demographic characterized by potentially vulnerable older women without spousal support or independent income sources. These patterns reflect both biological factors (female longevity) and social dynamics (male remarriage patterns).
The multi-decade data (1992-2022) illustrates significant demographic transitions. Rising educational attainment correlates directly with evolving marriage and childbearing patterns. The decline in early marriage and teenage pregnancy rates parallels increased female educational participation, demonstrating the profound interconnection between educational investment and family formation decisions across generations.
Higher educational attainment appears to function as a protective factor for women throughout adulthood. Women with secondary education maintain more stable marriage rates across age cohorts and demonstrate lower economic inactivity in middle age. This suggests education provides a dual resilience benefit, enhancing both relationship stability and economic security throughout the life course.
These interconnected patterns illustrate how educational opportunities, geographic location, economic conditions, and demographic decisions form a complex ecosystem where changes in one domain create ripple effects across others.